From: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
To: John Graham <john.graham@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Building x86_64 without host libs (e.g. zlib)
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 12:42:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z59aKLhibcJl5SSX@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acdfa5e1-e715-4529-af87-1aa66a463e1c@codethink.co.uk>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 03:41:05PM +0000, John Graham wrote:
> I'm trying to build an x86_64 toolchain that's independent of the host. By
> default in the ptxconfigs/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu_gcc config, it has e.g.
> `PTXCONF_HOST_SYSTEM_ZLIB=y`. I expected I could set this to `=n`, but when
> I do that, `ptxdist go` fails with:
>
> ```
>
> ptxdist: error: 'host-system-zlib' is not selected.
> ptxdist: error: This can happen if the ptxconfig is outdated or
> ptxdist: error: the package is disabled for the current architecture
>
> ```
>
> Can anyone tell me if this is the proper approach to disabling use of the
> host libraries, and/or what I'm doing wrong? Any help appreciated!
There are issues on multiple levels:
1. just changing the config file will not make the dependency go away. If
you look at the package rules in rules/ you'll see multiple ones that have
'select HOST_SYSTEM_ZLIB'. That's what is causing the error you're seeing.
2. Even if you remove those, building will probably fail. The dependency is
there for a reason. You would definitely need to remove the
--with-system-zlib that's there in several places. But I'm not sure, if
that's enough. It's quite possible that for some of the packages, zlib is
a hard requirement.
Why would you want to build without zlib anyways? It's not the only
requirement and removing just that seem odd.
Michael
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-02 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 15:41 John Graham
2025-02-02 11:42 ` Michael Olbrich [this message]
2025-02-03 8:37 ` John Graham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z59aKLhibcJl5SSX@pengutronix.de \
--to=m.olbrich@pengutronix.de \
--cc=john.graham@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=ptxdist@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox