From: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
To: Christian Melki <christian.melki@t2data.com>, ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Patch series for package per project?
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:10:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiHJdIJPKEQ4cGwk@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220303203533.GC26895@falbala.internal.home.lespocky.de>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:35:36PM +0100, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:11:39PM +0100, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 08:37:45PM +0100, Christian Melki wrote:
> > > On 3/3/22 18:07, Felix Mellmann wrote:
> > > > On 03.03.22 15:22, Christian Melki wrote:
> > > >> Just one barebox version, but for different archs, with different
> > > >> patchsets. I'd like the patches to live in the same place as they've
> > > >> always done, i.e. under patches/package/...
> > > >> But patches/package/series.$platform or similar does not seem to work?
> > > >>
> > > > Would it be an option to put the patches below each of the platformdirs?
> > > >
> > > > I ran into a similiar situation when starting to migrate to a different
> > > > CPU platform. After a couple of years putting serveral "platformconfig"
> > > > files within the same directory as "ptxconfig" I'm now using separate
> > > > subdirs for each platform where separate sets of platform dependent
> > > > patches are lying.
That would be my first suggestion as well.
> > > Ideally not. It irks me a bit that patches have to go to a different
> > > place because they belong to another platform than the "default". Or
> > > that they have to go somewhere else altogether because they need to be
> > > split into platforms.
> > > It doesn't make much sense to me.
I guess that's a matter of perspective. For me, either the patch stack is
shared. Then I out it in the common directory. Or each platform has a
completely separate patch stack. Then it feels natural to have them in
separate locations in each platform.
> > If I understand you correctly, your folder patches/barebox-2022.03.0
> > (or whatever common version you use) must look like this somehow, all
> > patches of the different series interleaved?
> >
> > 0001-apples.patch
> > 0001-foo.patch
> > 0001-this.patch
> > 0002-bar.patch
> > 0002-oranges.patch
> > 0002-that.patch
> > 0003-baz.patch
> > series.one
> > series.three
> > series.two
>
> Now, what if those series are not mutually exclusive, but certain
> patches are part of multiple series? Even worse: in different places,
> like first patch in one, and third patch in the other series? Each
> call of `git ptx-patches` would change the file numbers in the file
> names, breaking the other series?
Exactly. Maintaining shared patches is a mess. When I have more patches and
especially if they are shared, then I work with a clone of the package
upstream git. I use 'ptxdist local-src' for development and then export a
full patch stack into the BSP.
If the patch stacks for multiple platforms share some patches then they are
in a shared branch in git, but in the BSP each platform has its own copy.
> > Seriously, that looks messy to me, how should anyone looking at the
> > directory know which patch belongs to which series without looking at
> > the series files? What if someone wants to copy/move all patches
> > belonging to only one series to a different place?
>
> What I would do, and in fact I did this with patches for U-Boot for
> five different boards: throw all patches into one series. Why
> separate them? Or if that's not possible, put distinct patch series
> configs/platform-XXX/patches/barebox-2022.03.0 as suggested before.
I personally don't like having unrelated and unnecessary patches in my
patchstack...
> Well, there's one more possibility: put the patch series to different
> top layers. ;-)
You could also put something like this in platforms/barebox-series.in:
config BAREBOX_SERIES
string
default "series${PTXDIST_PLATFORMSUFFIX}"
This will be used automatically and you have a series for each platform.
Or add a prompt and explicitly set the series filename.
Michael
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de
To unsubscribe, send a mail with subject "unsubscribe" to ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-04 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 9:17 Christian Melki
2022-03-03 13:40 ` Michael Olbrich
2022-03-03 14:22 ` Christian Melki
2022-03-03 17:07 ` Felix Mellmann
2022-03-03 19:37 ` Christian Melki
2022-03-03 20:11 ` Alexander Dahl
2022-03-03 20:35 ` Alexander Dahl
2022-03-04 8:10 ` Michael Olbrich [this message]
2022-03-04 8:24 ` Christian Melki
2022-03-04 15:16 ` Christian Melki
2022-03-04 15:34 ` Michael Olbrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YiHJdIJPKEQ4cGwk@pengutronix.de \
--to=m.olbrich@pengutronix.de \
--cc=christian.melki@t2data.com \
--cc=ptxdist@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox