From: MC Potgieter <mc.rdc@mweb.co.za>
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Building a older version toolchain using a a newer version ptxdist
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:50:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPTGAH4KzpDOFiA0Q_-VJyJJqOiaZER6HmkJHr_BY6dsvTxUhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205161939.42422.jbe@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> MC Potgieter wrote:
>> I'm trying to build the latest available combination of tools
>> (ptxdist, BSP and toolchain)
>>
>> My versions are (this is the latest available tools):
>>
>> ptxdist: 2012.05.0
>> oselas toolchain: 2011.11.0
>> oselas BSP: 2012.02.0
>>
>> After installing ptxdist I configure the toolchain:
>>
>> ptxdist select ptxconfigs/arm-v4t-linux-gnueabi_gcc-4.6.2_glibc-2.14.1_binutils-2.21.1a_kernel-2.6.39-sanitized.ptxconfig
>>
>> and then try and build it, but I get:
>>
>> error: The ptxconfig file version and ptxdist version do not match:
>>
>> configfile version: 2011.11.0
>> ptxdist version: 2012.05.0
>>
>> Which ptxconfig should I select to get matching versions (where is it
>> located)? Or should I force the build?
>
> Building every OSELAS.Toolchain-2011.11.0/1 is tested with PTXdist-2011.11.0. If
> you want to be safe, install PTXdist-2011.11.0 and build the toolchain with
> this version.
> If you are brave, you can force the build also with the PTXdist-2012.05.0.
> Most of the time it will work, but this version combination is not tested here.
> So, in case of trouble we will blame you ;)
>
> Regards,
> Juergen
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert |
> Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
>
> --
> ptxdist mailing list
> ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Hi Juergen,
Then what about the BSP? Will I have to use the 2011.11.0 BSP too?
I want to take advantage of the latest packages available in the
latest BSP (2012.02.0).
If I'm going to compile BSP 2012.02.0 when using ptx 2011 and
toolchain 2011 it is going to give me the same error.
What should I do? What combination of tools should I use to compile
the latest BSP?
MC
--
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 16:56 MC Potgieter
2012-05-16 17:13 ` MC Potgieter
2012-05-16 17:39 ` Juergen Beisert
2012-05-16 17:50 ` MC Potgieter [this message]
2012-05-16 18:31 ` MC Potgieter
2012-05-21 10:59 ` Alexander Dahl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPTGAH4KzpDOFiA0Q_-VJyJJqOiaZER6HmkJHr_BY6dsvTxUhQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mc.rdc@mweb.co.za \
--cc=ptxdist@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox