On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> wrote:

> Hei hei,
>
> On 08.01.2014 03:32, Jon Ringle wrote:
> > My initial thought is to create a git repo that holds the ptxconfig files
> > and local rules/, and then configure the rules to somehow get the git
> repos
> > by tag for building (as it seems that there is some sort of support for
> > this in scripts/lib/ptxd_make_get.sh)... but I don't quite understand how
> > to integrate this in my rules/*.make file.
>
> This is exactly what we do, alas we do not use any ptxdist magic but two
> self written shell scripts residing in another git repository "scripts"
> included as submodule. Our rules/foo.make use one script for the get and
> one for the extract stage. Those scripts make are called with two extra
> variables from rules/foo.in as parameter. For each of our own packages
> those describe clone path and which git entity (branch, tag, changeset)
> to checkout after cloning. All these packages are cloned to
> local_src/foo and build with cmake in local_src/foo-git. I assume all
> this specific to our needs, but that's the way we do it. If you're
> interested in the scripts, tell me.
>
>
Yes, I would be interested to see your scripts and how you use them in your
*.make and *.in :)


> However I'm also curious about other ways. Is there a nice ptxdist way
> to handle packages without tarball coming directly from some git repo?
>
> Greets
> Alex
>
>
>
> --
> ptxdist mailing list
> ptxdist@pengutronix.de
>
>