From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::244]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fQHj4-0001SD-CW for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 21:34:38 +0200 Received: by mail-lf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id u4-v6so5403894lff.3 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:34:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180605190410.sq674lflej3qk5rh@falbala.home.lespocky.de> References: <1528219086-27116-1-git-send-email-jon@ringle.org> <20180605180548.g5pa7scter7ycl3r@falbala.home.lespocky.de> <20180605190410.sq674lflej3qk5rh@falbala.home.lespocky.de> From: Jon Ringle Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 15:34:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] libelf: version bump 0.170 -> 0.171 List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0846808006==" Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "ptxdist" To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de, Jon Ringle , Jon Ringle , Clemens Gruber --===============0846808006== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fca7d2056dea2309" --000000000000fca7d2056dea2309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Hei hei, > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 02:20:37PM -0400, Jon Ringle wrote: > > The bump to 0.171 fixed the errors I was getting when building 0.170, so > I > > think the patch is not needed > > I already saw your v2 also removing the patch. > > The reason Clemens introduced the patch was compilation failed with > GCC >= 8. Did you test that? (I can't, don't have a bleeding edge > system at hand.) Maybe Clemens can elaborate? > > I was getting errors when building 0.170 with gcc-7.3.1 and the errors went away when I bumped to 0.171. I don't have gcc-8 to test with -Jon --000000000000fca7d2056dea2309 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de>= ; wrote:
Hei hei,

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 02:20:37PM -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
> The bump to 0.171 fixed the errors I was getting when building 0.170, = so I
> think the patch is not needed

I already saw your v2 also removing the patch.

The reason Clemens introduced the patch was compilation failed with
GCC >=3D 8. Did you test that? (I can't, don't have a bleeding e= dge
system at hand.) Maybe Clemens can elaborate?

<= br>
I was getting errors when building 0.170 with gcc-7.3.1 and t= he errors went away when I bumped to 0.171. I don't have gcc-8 to test = with
-Jon

--000000000000fca7d2056dea2309-- --===============0846808006== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KcHR4ZGlzdCBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKcHR4ZGlzdEBwZW5ndXRyb25peC5kZQ== --===============0846808006==--