mailarchive of the ptxdist mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ptxdist] License info for no-source packages
@ 2018-02-08 14:53 Alm, Michael
  2018-02-08 19:06 ` Alexander Dahl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alm, Michael @ 2018-02-08 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'ptxdist@pengutronix.de'

Hi,

I have some ptxdist packages that do not use any source code. , For example they just make some configuration to the rootfs, like creating symlinks. So there is no real need to provide license information. But this way I get ugly warnings in the License Report (ptxdist 2015.05.0), because of unknown licenses. 

What is best-practice for the LICENSE info in the rule file in that case?
Would it be possible to exclude these packages from the license report?

Thx
Michael


_______________________________________________
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-08 19:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-08 14:53 [ptxdist] License info for no-source packages Alm, Michael
2018-02-08 19:06 ` Alexander Dahl

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox