From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from gallifrey.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:5054:ff:fe8d:eefb] helo=bjornoya.do.blackshift.org) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WLCgd-0002kc-5C for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:20:43 +0100 Received: from [IPv6:2001:6f8:105b:1122:5e51:4fff:fed6:c770] (unknown [IPv6:2001:6f8:105b:1122:5e51:4fff:fed6:c770]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: frogger) by bjornoya.do.blackshift.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D94155EA41 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:20:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <531732BA.6010404@pengutronix.de> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:20:42 +0100 From: Marc Kleine-Budde MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1393526441-26090-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <20140305084845.GA1034@omega> <20140305094854.GD32080@pengutronix.de> <20140305103724.GA2896@omega> In-Reply-To: <20140305103724.GA2896@omega> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] libcoap: add new package Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0045768019==" Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============0045768019== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dghHHaGgA0V4LQNX8Tp5FlPVVODsTFrwv" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --dghHHaGgA0V4LQNX8Tp5FlPVVODsTFrwv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/05/2014 11:37 AM, Alexander Aring wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:48:54AM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:48:47AM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote: >>> I see you applied other patch "libzmq: add new package" already. Is >>> there something wrong with this patch or simple needs a little more t= ime >>> to review? :-) >> >> I need some clarification mostly. You're replacing the whole build-sys= tem. >> That's not something I want to maintain inside ptxdist. I can only acc= ept >> that if this will be upstream the next time we update the package in >> ptxdist. So what's the upstream status of these patches? >> > Maintainer don't want to use automake in his buildsystem, I think it > will never go into mainline of libcoap. There is also no mailinglist fo= r > this project, I mailed with the maintainer private. What about cmake? Marc --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | --dghHHaGgA0V4LQNX8Tp5FlPVVODsTFrwv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMXMroACgkQjTAFq1RaXHOxEACfcpR0aP65A98qvU/85q0Q4uTU VG0AoJQct6+ZsiN1McIC8vU7+iExsc1V =4nsm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dghHHaGgA0V4LQNX8Tp5FlPVVODsTFrwv-- --===============0045768019== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de --===============0045768019==--