mailarchive of the ptxdist mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de>
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] git ptxdist best practices
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 06:56:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CCE8A8.8070906@lespocky.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMwGMjx4iu-2w2OVEpjX7T9USnzEAE70XH+pff_ksaCuvA63Wg@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1250 bytes --]

Hei hei,

On 08.01.2014 03:32, Jon Ringle wrote:
> My initial thought is to create a git repo that holds the ptxconfig files
> and local rules/, and then configure the rules to somehow get the git repos
> by tag for building (as it seems that there is some sort of support for
> this in scripts/lib/ptxd_make_get.sh)... but I don't quite understand how
> to integrate this in my rules/*.make file.

This is exactly what we do, alas we do not use any ptxdist magic but two
self written shell scripts residing in another git repository "scripts"
included as submodule. Our rules/foo.make use one script for the get and
one for the extract stage. Those scripts make are called with two extra
variables from rules/foo.in as parameter. For each of our own packages
those describe clone path and which git entity (branch, tag, changeset)
to checkout after cloning. All these packages are cloned to
local_src/foo and build with cmake in local_src/foo-git. I assume all
this specific to our needs, but that's the way we do it. If you're
interested in the scripts, tell me.

However I'm also curious about other ways. Is there a nice ptxdist way
to handle packages without tarball coming directly from some git repo?

Greets
Alex



[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 48 bytes --]

-- 
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-08  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-08  2:32 Jon Ringle
2014-01-08  5:56 ` Alexander Dahl [this message]
2014-01-08  6:12   ` Jon Ringle
2014-01-08  9:21     ` Alexander Dahl
2014-01-08  9:48       ` Alexander Dahl
2014-01-08  9:52       ` Jürgen Beisert
2014-01-08 17:56       ` Jon Ringle
2014-01-08 20:43         ` Alexander Dahl
2014-01-08  7:59 ` Jürgen Beisert
2014-01-08 14:14   ` Jon Ringle
2014-01-09  8:10     ` Jürgen Beisert
2014-01-09  9:03   ` Olbrich, Michael
2014-01-09 15:23     ` Jon Ringle
2014-01-09 16:06       ` Michael Olbrich
2014-01-09 16:37         ` Jon Ringle
2014-01-10 15:37           ` Michael Olbrich
2014-01-10 15:41             ` Jon Ringle
2014-01-11  1:47             ` Jon Ringle
2014-01-24  9:21               ` Michael Olbrich
2014-01-24 13:10                 ` Jon Ringle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CCE8A8.8070906@lespocky.de \
    --to=post@lespocky.de \
    --cc=ptxdist@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox