From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.4]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmruh-0006w0-0F for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:12:48 +0100 Message-ID: <50D765C4.6070702@erwinrol.com> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:12:52 +0100 From: Erwin Rol MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50D44105.9050900@erwinrol.com> <20121221184629.GE23720@pengutronix.de> <20121221195444.2a75df2e@skate> <1697569.HrfM5Tud5B@virgo> In-Reply-To: <1697569.HrfM5Tud5B@virgo> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Qt 5 Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Cc: Tim Sander On 22-12-2012 20:42, Tim Sander wrote: > Hi >>> I'm working on it. Not sure, when you'll see something. > Thats great news. I could give the rasperry a shot, but not right now... >> Since you're talking about Qt 5 and OpenGL, my understanding is that Qt >> 5 absolutely required OpenGL. Is this correct? If so, what's the plan >> for more basic ARM SoCs that don't have 3D acceleration? > I think the best solution would be to keep qt4 and qt5 as seperate packages. > The qt4.8.4 is pretty recent and well i guess most of the work has been done > or is the maintenance burden so high? The ptxdist Qt 4 package is called qt4 so adding a qt5 package should be simple. Keeping them both will be needed anyway, cause qt5 is not 100% backwards compatible with qt4. - Erwin -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de