From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.36]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RohLY-0000Ta-I6 for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:15:36 +0100 Received: from [93.104.153.52] (helo=galilei.fritz.box) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1RohLY-0006gq-63 for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:15:32 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1B1CE3.3030603@bwalle.de> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:15:31 +0100 From: Bernhard Walle MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120119214755.GF4854@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20120119214755.GF4854@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] cross-compiling and uname Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Hi Michael, Am 19.01.12 22:47, schrieb Michael Olbrich: > > we had some patches lately about configure scripts etc. using uname to > detect stuff. Why don't we create a fake ../sysroot-cross/bin/uname that > produces the output we would expect on the target? > This way we don't have to fix all those packages and we have on less source > of host system information leaking into the build. I agree with the others: Fixing the packages is the better solution in my opinion. For the neon fix I'm trying to bring the patch upstream, so that would be one patch less in the long term. Especially as the absolute number of packages affected is quite low. With the current git ptxdist (and one fix for the kernel and module-init-tools I didn't post yet) and Andreas' OSELAS.Toolchain patches I'm able to build a complete image for my weather station receiver on Mac OS. :) Regards, Bernhard -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de