From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de>
Received: from mo-p00-ob6.rzone.de ([2a01:238:20a:202:53f0::1])
	by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=1317b8cd6d=holzmayr@rsi-elektrotechnik.de>)
	id 1RWOpm-0007ZA-Qd
	for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:51:08 +0100
Received: from mail.rsi.local (p5091F5F5.dip.t-dialin.net [80.145.245.245])
	by smtp.strato.de (cohen mo44) (RZmta 26.10 AUTH)
	with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) ESMTPA id j0555fnB27sX83
	for <ptxdist@pengutronix.de>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:51:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [192.168.1.77] by mail.rsi.local (MDaemon PRO v12.5.1)
	with ESMTP id md50000074860.msg
	for <ptxdist@pengutronix.de>; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:50:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4ED8916D.7080202@rsi-elektrotechnik.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:50:53 +0100
From: Josef Holzmayr <holzmayr@rsi-elektrotechnik.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4ED61796.7090105@amk-drives.bg>
	<20111201182924.GD32672@pengutronix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20111201182924.GD32672@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Automatic package rebuild after rule/patch file update
Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List <ptxdist.pengutronix.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/pipermail/ptxdist>
List-Post: <mailto:ptxdist@pengutronix.de>
List-Help: <mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de

On 01.12.2011 19:29, Michael Olbrich wrote:
>> Now I try to prepare script that will check before SVN update and
>> remove states for changed packages, but if there is a elegant way
>> it's better to use.
>
> Not right now. I've tried to do this, but so far I could not find a way to
> do this, that performs well.

Is a simple mtime comparison too unreliable? If it is, by "not =

performing well" I guess you mean the obvious possibility to hash the =

rules files...

Greetz
_____________________________________________________________
Josef Holzmayr
Dipl-Ing. (FH)
Entwicklung Embedded Devices / Software

Tel.: +49 8444 9204-48>
Fax:  +49 8444 9204-50
holzmayr@rsi-elektrotechnik.de

R-S-I Elektrotechnik GmbH & Co. KG
Woelkestrasse 11
D-85301 Schweitenkirchen
www.rsi-elektrotechnik.de
_____________________________________________________________
Amtsgericht Ingolstadt - GmbH: HRB 191328 - KG: HRA 170363
Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Dr.-Ing. Michael Sorg, Dipl.-Ing. Franz Sorg
USt-IdNr.: DE 128592548


-- =

ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de