From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: From: Alexander Dahl Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 15:16:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4933953.zd8LfGRCK0@ada> In-Reply-To: <20190904130504.5cp7hzodc4u4egn6@pengutronix.de> References: <20190822104241.21777-1-rhi@pengutronix.de> <2927514.lnS8Y61pnd@ada> <20190904130504.5cp7hzodc4u4egn6@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [RFC 3/4] libptxdist: add a function to find unreferenced source directories List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "ptxdist" To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Cc: Michael Olbrich Hello Michael, Am Mittwoch, 4. September 2019, 15:05:04 CEST schrieb Michael Olbrich: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:01:58AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > FWIW, we are still using different versions of at91bootstrap in different > > BSPs. The legacy version (at91bootstrap) has patches in the directory > > 'patches/Bootstrap-v1.16' and the current version (at91bootstrap2) has > > them in 'patches/at91bootstrap-3.8.13'. > > > > If one or the other package needs fixes, let me know. > > PTXdist upstream has patches for 'at91bootstrap'. Do you use those, or do > you have your own patch stack in your BSP? > > I'd like to remove the patches from PTXdist. It's the only packages that > has a configurable version and patches for one specific version upstream. We have our own patches anyway. And even if not, it would also be no problem to add them to our BSP, if ptxdist won't ship those anymore. Greets Alex _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de