From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de>
From: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:01:58 +0200
Message-ID: <2927514.lnS8Y61pnd@ada>
In-Reply-To: <20190823083342.cs5ndzwsxey7dwba@pengutronix.de>
References: <20190822104241.21777-1-rhi@pengutronix.de>
 <20190822153819.cjrfzrhe4ewc4up2@pengutronix.de>
 <20190823083342.cs5ndzwsxey7dwba@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [RFC 3/4] libptxdist: add a function to find
 unreferenced source directories
List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List <ptxdist.pengutronix.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ptxdist>, 
 <mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/private/ptxdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:ptxdist@pengutronix.de>
List-Help: <mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ptxdist>, 
 <mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
Sender: "ptxdist" <ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de>
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Cc: Roland Hieber <rhi@pengutronix.de>

Hei hei,

Am Freitag, 23. August 2019, 10:33:42 CEST schrieb Roland Hieber:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 05:38:19PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:42:40PM +0200, Roland Hieber wrote:
> > > +
> > > +	# get list of dirs for which no package exists
> > > +	comm --nocheck-order -13 ${pkgslistfile} ${patchdirfile} | while 
read
> > > dir; do +		ptxd_in_path PTXDIST_PATH_PATCHES ${dir}
> > > +		ptxd_print_path ${ptxd_reply}
> > > +	done | while read line; do
> > > +		# annotate packages that are built specially or their version
> > > +		# depends on enabling kconfig entries
> > > +		case i in
> > > +			*alsa-lib*|*at91bootstrap*|*barebox*)
> > 
> > I think we can 'fix' the alsa-lib false positives.
> > And maybe we should just remove the at91bootstrap patches, they are really
> > old anyways.
> > But why barebox? There should be no old patches, right?
> 
> Ah, yes. I was thinking at91bootstrap can be disabled, so the version
> number is empty, and the same can be said for barebox too. But the only
> location where Barebox patches occur is at the BSP level, and I guess
> it doesn't happen that someone switches from barebox to at91bootstrap
> with patches lying around locally.

FWIW, we are still using different versions of at91bootstrap in different 
BSPs. The legacy version (at91bootstrap) has patches in the directory 
'patches/Bootstrap-v1.16' and the current version (at91bootstrap2) has them in 
'patches/at91bootstrap-3.8.13'.

If one or the other package needs fixes, let me know.

Greets
Alex


_______________________________________________
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de