From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Wed, 25 May 2022 10:38:44 +0200 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ntmXU-008S2I-B2 for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Wed, 25 May 2022 10:38:44 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=metis.ext.pengutronix.de) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ntmXT-0006zs-RT; Wed, 25 May 2022 10:38:43 +0200 Received: from mail.thorsis.com ([92.198.35.195]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ntmWj-0006zj-0D for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Wed, 25 May 2022 10:37:58 +0200 Received: from adahl by ada.ifak-system.com with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ntmWe-0001Xf-Dn for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Wed, 25 May 2022 10:37:52 +0200 From: Alexander Dahl To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 10:37:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20220525083752.5881-1-ada@thorsis.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.ext.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: [ptxdist] [PATCH v2 0/2] at: version bump and remove from staging X-BeenThere: ptxdist@pengutronix.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Sender: "ptxdist" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hei hei, we are using 'at', but on an older BSP version still. Maybe we can get this out of staging again nevertheless? Builds fine with OSELAS.Toolchain-2016.06.1/arm-v5te-linux-gnueabi on ptxdist-2018.05.0, I have no more recent system at hand currently. Maybe someone else wants to test it? Runtime test with our usecase is fine. RFC -> v2: - remove old patch series (forgot that in first iteration) - add patch to revert moving the package to staging Greets Alex Alexander Dahl (2): at: version bump 3.1.12 -> 3.2.5 Revert "at: move to staging" ...ove-manual-compiler-check-with-AC_TR.patch | 33 ------- ...vert-AC_TRY_COMPILE-AC_COMPILE_IFELS.patch | 34 ------- ...file.in-add-LDFLAGS-to-linking-stage.patch | 38 -------- ...Makefile.in-replace-IROOT-by-DESTDIR.patch | 97 ------------------- patches/at-3.1.12/autogen.sh | 1 - patches/at-3.1.12/series | 4 - rules/at.in | 8 +- rules/at.make | 11 ++- 8 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 219 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 patches/at-3.1.12/0001-configure.ac-remove-manual-compiler-check-with-AC_TR.patch delete mode 100644 patches/at-3.1.12/0002-configure.ac-convert-AC_TRY_COMPILE-AC_COMPILE_IFELS.patch delete mode 100644 patches/at-3.1.12/0003-Makefile.in-add-LDFLAGS-to-linking-stage.patch delete mode 100644 patches/at-3.1.12/0005-Makefile.in-replace-IROOT-by-DESTDIR.patch delete mode 120000 patches/at-3.1.12/autogen.sh delete mode 100644 patches/at-3.1.12/series base-commit: 6f8f19ff434b20efd3caeb779873d401f5c3dead -- 2.30.2