From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHnQD-0008Az-3z for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:45:09 +0100 Received: from rhi by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHnQC-0007lK-R3 for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:45:08 +0100 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:45:08 +0100 From: Roland Hieber Message-ID: <20200327114508.am5xqlkzuvzvljyj@pengutronix.de> References: <20200327101020.GQ9765@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200327101020.GQ9765@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Scripted 'applied' mails List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "ptxdist" To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:10:20AM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: > Hi, > > As you may have noticed, I sent out some scripted 'patch applied' mails. > I've been working on my tooling a bit and this is one of the results from > this. > > This is still work in progress, so please speak up if you notice any > problems with this. I am also interested in suggestions about the content > of the mail. Anything I should add? The commit hash would be nice to have, and the branch name too for the sake of completeness. But for now, this is already a big improvement! - Roland -- Roland Hieber, Pengutronix e.K. | r.hieber@pengutronix.de | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de