From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHlwS-0006Er-DK for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:10:20 +0100 Received: from mol by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHlwS-000367-4G for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:10:20 +0100 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:10:20 +0100 From: Michael Olbrich Message-ID: <20200327101020.GQ9765@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [ptxdist] Scripted 'applied' mails List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "ptxdist" To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Hi, As you may have noticed, I sent out some scripted 'patch applied' mails. I've been working on my tooling a bit and this is one of the results from this. This is still work in progress, so please speak up if you notice any problems with this. I am also interested in suggestions about the content of the mail. Anything I should add? Right now, this only works if I don't modify the patch. Otherwise the matching algorithm wont find it. I hope that I can fix that in the future. That's one of the reasons why I add the 'Message-Id' tag when I apply patches. Regards, Michael -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de