From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:05:04 +0200 From: Michael Olbrich Message-ID: <20190904130504.5cp7hzodc4u4egn6@pengutronix.de> References: <20190822104241.21777-1-rhi@pengutronix.de> <20190822153819.cjrfzrhe4ewc4up2@pengutronix.de> <20190823083342.cs5ndzwsxey7dwba@pengutronix.de> <2927514.lnS8Y61pnd@ada> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2927514.lnS8Y61pnd@ada> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [RFC 3/4] libptxdist: add a function to find unreferenced source directories List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "ptxdist" To: Alexander Dahl Cc: ptxdist@pengutronix.de On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:01:58AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Hei hei, > > Am Freitag, 23. August 2019, 10:33:42 CEST schrieb Roland Hieber: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 05:38:19PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:42:40PM +0200, Roland Hieber wrote: > > > > + > > > > + # get list of dirs for which no package exists > > > > + comm --nocheck-order -13 ${pkgslistfile} ${patchdirfile} | while > read > > > > dir; do + ptxd_in_path PTXDIST_PATH_PATCHES ${dir} > > > > + ptxd_print_path ${ptxd_reply} > > > > + done | while read line; do > > > > + # annotate packages that are built specially or their version > > > > + # depends on enabling kconfig entries > > > > + case i in > > > > + *alsa-lib*|*at91bootstrap*|*barebox*) > > > > > > I think we can 'fix' the alsa-lib false positives. > > > And maybe we should just remove the at91bootstrap patches, they are really > > > old anyways. > > > But why barebox? There should be no old patches, right? > > > > Ah, yes. I was thinking at91bootstrap can be disabled, so the version > > number is empty, and the same can be said for barebox too. But the only > > location where Barebox patches occur is at the BSP level, and I guess > > it doesn't happen that someone switches from barebox to at91bootstrap > > with patches lying around locally. > > FWIW, we are still using different versions of at91bootstrap in different > BSPs. The legacy version (at91bootstrap) has patches in the directory > 'patches/Bootstrap-v1.16' and the current version (at91bootstrap2) has them in > 'patches/at91bootstrap-3.8.13'. > > If one or the other package needs fixes, let me know. PTXdist upstream has patches for 'at91bootstrap'. Do you use those, or do you have your own patch stack in your BSP? I'd like to remove the patches from PTXdist. It's the only packages that has a configurable version and patches for one specific version upstream. Michael -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de