From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138] helo=cvs.linux-mips.org) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i3Je0-00073O-60 for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:35:16 +0200 Received: (from localhost user: 'ladis' uid#1021 fake: STDIN (ladis@eddie.linux-mips.org)) by eddie.linux-mips.org id S23992241AbfH2MfOeXJC4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:35:14 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:35:11 +0200 From: Ladislav Michl Message-ID: <20190829123511.GA19758@lenoch> References: <20190515070045.GA3755@lenoch> <20190517143210.gn54u2mvfb4vk5wy@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190517143210.gn54u2mvfb4vk5wy@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [RFC] casync: new package List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "ptxdist" To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:32:10PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:00:45AM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl > > --- > > Hi there, > > > > this is just an attempt to find you how (if at all) are people using > > rauc with casync support. Packages here are good enough to run > > $ PATH=$ROOT/sysroot-host/bin:$ROOT/sysroot-host/sbin:$PATH > > $ rauc convert --cerrt=/rauc/rauc.cert.pem --key=/rauc/rauc.key.pem --keyring=/projectroot/etc/rauc/ca.cert.pem /update.raucb casync-bundle.raucb > > after rauc bundle is built. Resulting index and chunk store can > > be then used to update target system. > > > > Do we want it as another image target? Anyone is using any other > > scenario? Gentle ping. Are there any casync users out there? > > Also, to make host-casync built we need host-xz with f9b48616ef47 > > ("host-xz: Don't build with shared libs") reverted. That commit log > > says: > > We don't need shared librarys of host-xz. When they are enabled, > > building host-gettext may fail because of mixed shared library versions. > > Is that still an issue? > > Probably not. If I remember correctly, then host-gettext was built with > system libxz (if found) at the time. If libxz was then built afterwards and > was an older version, then executing some gettext tool would fail because > it used the wrong libxz. > We build host-gettext with --without-xz now, so I hope, this is no longer > an issue. > You can test this by installing xz devel files and then build host-gettext > and see if it uses libxz. For the record, this is indeed not an issue any longer, so patch enabling shared liblzma will be part of next version patch set. ladis _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de