From: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] protobuf: version bump 3.3.1 -> 3.3.2
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:50:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170922135035.jwsaq2hbrvw3zfuf@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170920161950.3cf147d8@erd980>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:19:50PM +0200, David Jander wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:31:15 -0400
> jon@ringle.org wrote:
>
> > From: Jon Ringle <jringle@gridpoint.com>
> >
> > This fixes unused parameter 'deterministic' issue:
> > src/backend-common/backend_ipc.pb.cc:32994:10: error: unused parameter 'deterministic' [-Werror=unused-parameter]
> > bool deterministic, ::google::protobuf::uint8* target) const {
> > ^
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Ringle <jringle@gridpoint.com>
> > ---
> > patches/{protobuf-3.3.1 => protobuf-3.3.2}/autogen.sh | 0
> > rules/protobuf.make | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > rename patches/{protobuf-3.3.1 => protobuf-3.3.2}/autogen.sh (100%)
> >
> > diff --git a/patches/protobuf-3.3.1/autogen.sh b/patches/protobuf-3.3.2/autogen.sh
> > similarity index 100%
> > rename from patches/protobuf-3.3.1/autogen.sh
> > rename to patches/protobuf-3.3.2/autogen.sh
> > diff --git a/rules/protobuf.make b/rules/protobuf.make
> > index 35d065b..97761d7 100644
> > --- a/rules/protobuf.make
> > +++ b/rules/protobuf.make
> > @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ PACKAGES-$(PTXCONF_PROTOBUF) += protobuf
> > #
> > # Paths and names
> > #
> > -PROTOBUF_VERSION := 3.3.1
> > -PROTOBUF_MD5 := 20c685147753b515ce380421442044b5
> > +PROTOBUF_VERSION := 3.3.2
> > +PROTOBUF_MD5 := 19ed45d0cbbb88de2c4922978235d314
> > PROTOBUF := protobuf-$(PROTOBUF_VERSION)
> > PROTOBUF_SUFFIX := tar.gz
> > PROTOBUF_URL := https://github.com/google/protobuf/archive/v$(PROTOBUF_VERSION).$(PROTOBUF_SUFFIX)
>
> If I download protobuf-3.3.2 today from this URL, I get a different MD5sum:
>
> $ md5sum src/protobuf-3.3.2.tar.gz
> ef2a6a6bb3b92d8fa8d71e3cef741f2f src/protobuf-3.3.2.tar.gz
>
> The contents of the file look very legit though (no accidental HTML error or
> such). It definitely contains something very similar to your protobuf-3.3.2
> AFAICS. Are github download archives MD5-stable? Am I opening some ugly can of
> worms here, or is there some serious security issue going on?
I have the file with the old md5 and got the new one with your md5. The
content is identical. So far github URLs were quite stable. I hope this
doesn't start a new trend. I'll add the new md5 to the rule.
Regards,
Michael
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-22 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-27 20:31 jon
2017-09-20 14:19 ` David Jander
2017-09-22 13:50 ` Michael Olbrich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170922135035.jwsaq2hbrvw3zfuf@pengutronix.de \
--to=m.olbrich@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ptxdist@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox