From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dldI6-0004mV-M3 for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sat, 26 Aug 2017 17:46:30 +0200 Received: from idefix.home.lespocky.de ([80.129.205.242]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LeUyk-1dBla233mg-00qSO8 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2017 17:46:24 +0200 Received: from falbala.home.lespocky.de ([192.168.243.94]) by idefix.home.lespocky.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dldHr-0002yv-Ee for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sat, 26 Aug 2017 17:46:23 +0200 Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 17:46:12 +0200 From: Alexander Dahl Message-ID: <20170826154611.wrwwcwde6tyjniu7@falbala.home.lespocky.de> References: <1503484602-31788-1-git-send-email-ada@thorsis.com> <1503484602-31788-2-git-send-email-ada@thorsis.com> <20170825073844.areqwicqxkj422qc@pengutronix.de> <2493508.by83Y0r79J@ada> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2493508.by83Y0r79J@ada> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH v2 1/4] lighttpd: Ugprade from 1.4.39 to 1.4.45 List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1745754802==" Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "ptxdist" To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de --===============1745754802== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i7qntqulcqq3kycj" Content-Disposition: inline --i7qntqulcqq3kycj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:05:13AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Marking LIGHTTPD_MEMCACHE(D) as broken would be the easiest for now I=20 > guess. Should this go into a separate patch, together with this one=20 > upgrading from 1.4.39 to 1.4.45, or in the second one which renames the= =20 > lighttpd package option? Currently I prefer putting it into the second patch, together with the renaming of the option. I'll test that in week 35, and =E2=80=93 if no one objects =E2=80=93 send a v3 then. Greets Alex --=20 =C2=BBWith the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured,= =20 the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all=20 irrevocably.=C2=AB (Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie) *** GnuPG-FP: C28E E6B9 0263 95CF 8FAF 08FA 34AD CD00 7221 5CC6 *** --i7qntqulcqq3kycj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEwo7muQJjlc+Prwj6NK3NAHIhXMYFAlmhl7QACgkQNK3NAHIh XMbrNg//USnRjVrlIYEBvHkN4lXBcjdODbsV3Ifi2GSFs/DQ1QHKudDqfDGFRtya qkplecf7RVWlY3APE7WBl9favbVJd76NueawGPW0ss0EJuUcD3w6H5Uu/eY3F2ls dhUC4/86GKnc6OvXrjA2p0l5xfYS2lj7HwO7VQPDHn2oqCOt+ndmm/h4p+V0u9r8 iIFqjeP2n1Z0vG+n4nFVIHgE7wANpEErCL15Ky0DH1WrEBijTVC3gidYBNaTC2lp DEv11aSJ+HWCnxkyRvWGF4VypaweUDd0dFLq7zgsX3QEeOL0FGpcQJT660dlN3us ykg0YpWbGa0nz87p9+cc1ipapgO4aeNmqvtIRZgt5MgC++L9N7op6Nu2hy+q4lW0 CnByRnue1i1a/xJrHClBGC+yf3NHwoIfnQXlndPNSEcpIfCQDzPaK0R70O5T0qZ4 erXXhGTlq/EXgrYHdLTdclbb/dYRENi21H3AarsrePrRgy/aNetclfhKPsecwVA8 GrnNyxRa3h7v8WzToB8PjL6L7hg06jxYgQ//yOQOJ/Jjr2A3CANCnELIJbFE/Vxf j6s387mQ4rNoNDuHtjbrLPRGlJhOtHGq4xeaY+VZmMu0I3kEd8FtmMiCK4X+/I5d I8vVPzbGt/uICSUqsumv5yB619V/tHZ+FArtZMfDtLgRw7rEc0M= =5luW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i7qntqulcqq3kycj-- --===============1745754802== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KcHR4ZGlzdCBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKcHR4ZGlzdEBwZW5ndXRyb25peC5kZQ== --===============1745754802==--