From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4008:c01::22d]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W7ghB-0002t9-MM for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:33:26 +0100 Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id v16so2665906bkz.32 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:33:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from omega (p20030064AA5E6601E2CB4EFFFE1BB546.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:64:aa5e:6601:e2cb:4eff:fe1b:b546]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rf10sm12702509bkb.3.2014.01.26.23.33.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:33:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:33:13 +0100 From: Alexander Aring Message-ID: <20140127073312.GA20644@omega> References: <1369655694-23889-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <20130603115325.GE1939@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130603115325.GE1939@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] wireshark: rework and update to wireshark 1.8.7 Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Hi Michael, On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 01:53:25PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:54:54PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > > This patch removes the build of common gtk-interface wireshark. > > Instead of the gtk-interface you can use the cli-interface (tshark) to > > capture network traffic into 'capture files'. > > On the host side, the gtk-wireshark interface can open the capture files > > and show the captured packets. > > > > I let the KConfig name to WIRESHARK, because it is a common name and all > > people who wants 'wireshark' on embedded targets mean 'tshark'. > > That's ok. The package should be named after the source anyways. > I haven't tested it yet, but it looks ok so far. I'll come bake to this > after the release. > ping :-) what's about this? Was there some problems to bake this wireshark cake? Should I resend and rebase this patches on current master? - Alex -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de