From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de>
Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.15])
	by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bernhard@bwalle.de>) id 1U0AKF-0002Ro-QX
	for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:30:11 +0100
Received: from [78.47.165.117] (helo=regiomontanus.your-server.de)
	by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <bernhard@bwalle.de>) id 1U0AKF-00045I-Bx
	for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:30:07 +0100
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:30:06 +0100
From: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
Message-ID: <20130129123006.GA22359@regiomontanus.your-server.de>
References: <em9e4ea0c2-d49e-416c-8676-34763e5195ea@nb-mak>
	<5107AE80.3040102@corscience.de>
	<20130129120642.GA6228@regiomontanus.your-server.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130129120642.GA6228@regiomontanus.your-server.de>
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Binary patches
Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List <ptxdist.pengutronix.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/pipermail/ptxdist>
List-Post: <mailto:ptxdist@pengutronix.de>
List-Help: <mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de

* Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de> [2013-01-29 13:06]:
> * Andreas Bie=DFmann <andreas.biessmann@corscience.de> [2013-01-29 12:12]:
> > On 29.01.2013 11:26, Matthias Klein wrote:
> > > Hi Juergen,
> > > =

> > >>Maybe only git itself is able to apply its own binary patches again,
> > > but not
> > >>the 'patch' tool.
> > > =

> > > Does that mean that the normal "ptxdist extract" step does not support
> > > binary patches (only "ptxdist extract --git") ?
> > =

> > Oups, it seems so. I used to set the 'Developer Option' 'use git to
> > apply patches'. Removing that produces the smae error for me:
> =

> Which version of patch do you have? Or do you use quilt to apply
> patches? Because the latest GNU patch at least claims to support binary
> git patches.

Okay, "supported" only means that it recognizes it and complains that it
doesn't support... :(

Regards,
Bernhard

-- =

ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de