From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] OT: Re: Why the huge version discrepancy between OSELAS Toolchain and PTXdist?
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 08:41:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005064140.GF23204@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201210022249.13507.tstone@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:49:13PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote:
> Sorry for the off topic post,
Traditionally, OSELAS.Toolchain questions are on-topic on this list :-)
> but as we are talkin toolchains over here: I've got the impression
> that the latest stable release of the toolchain
> OSELAS-Toolchain-2011.11.3 miscompiles on i.mx35?! I just tried to
> compile some stuff and the kernel dumped strange lock error oopses and
> our user application had some strange behaviour i couldn't explain:
> Some function calls where missed in an unconditional codepath.
> OSELAS.Toolchain-2011.03.1 works but sometimes i just try newer
> toolchains to shake out bugs in the code. So there is no urge on our
> side. But as there have been reports on misscompiles on arm lkml with
> gcc i thought i might bring that to attention?
Do you have proper error messages, code examples or test cases?
I havn't heared of problems with the arm11 toolchain recently. We
currently have problems with floating point / NEON with the cortex-a8
toolchain (sometimes floating point registers contain wrong values), but
this is not debugged yet.
But nothing on ARM11 so far.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-02 12:37 [ptxdist] " Adrian.Baumgarth
2012-10-02 17:48 ` Robert Schwebel
2012-10-02 20:49 ` [ptxdist] OT: " Tim Sander
2012-10-05 6:41 ` Robert Schwebel [this message]
2012-10-16 16:12 ` Michael Olbrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121005064140.GF23204@pengutronix.de \
--to=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ptxdist@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox