From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lnx503.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.156.232]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ9Ot-0001bv-22 for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:49:07 +0200 Received: from mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (lnx505.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.156.234]) by lnx503.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/HRZ/PMX) with ESMTP id q92Kn5B1013313 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 22:49:05 +0200 (envelope-from tstone@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de) Received: from [213.188.117.251] (helo=hydra.localnet) by mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ9Or-0002Bo-KY for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:49:05 +0200 From: Tim Sander Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 22:49:13 +0200 References: <9509D04A0F6C4D46B9ED146D5D70F04904A1083EB7@Kelfs003> <20121002174820.GH23204@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20121002174820.GH23204@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201210022249.13507.tstone@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Subject: [ptxdist] OT: Re: Why the huge version discrepancy between OSELAS Toolchain and PTXdist? Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Hi Sorry for the off topic post, but as we are talkin toolchains over here: I've got the impression that the latest stable release of the toolchain OSELAS-Toolchain-2011.11.3 miscompiles on i.mx35?! I just tried to compile some stuff and the kernel dumped strange lock error oopses and our user application had some strange behaviour i couldn't explain: Some function calls where missed in an unconditional codepath. OSELAS.Toolchain-2011.03.1 works but sometimes i just try newer toolchains to shake out bugs in the code. So there is no urge on our side. But as there have been reports on misscompiles on arm lkml with gcc i thought i might bring that to attention? Best regards Tim -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de