From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de>
Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:2:5054:ff:fec0:8e10]
	ident=Debian-exim) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mol@pengutronix.de>) id 1TIJ9K-0006PU-Ji
	for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:01:34 +0200
Received: from mol by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mol@pengutronix.de>) id 1TIJ9K-00058g-Jk
	for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:01:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:01:34 +0200
From: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20120930130134.GA19651@pengutronix.de>
References: <1343663693-12819-1-git-send-email-post@lespocky.de>
	<1343663693-12819-3-git-send-email-post@lespocky.de>
	<20120913160024.GD2365@pengutronix.de>
	<6808a5eb5e3048d992fbe5af5747561f@idefix.lespocky.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6808a5eb5e3048d992fbe5af5747561f@idefix.lespocky.dyndns.org>
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH 2/2] ssmtp: update setting build options to
 current ptxdist mechanisms
Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List <ptxdist.pengutronix.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/pipermail/ptxdist>
List-Post: <mailto:ptxdist@pengutronix.de>
List-Help: <mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:17:09PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Am 2012-09-13 18:00, schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > any special reason why you switch from CROSS_AUTOCONF_ROOT to
> > CROSS_AUTOCONF_USR?
> 
> No reason.

Then leave it as it is.

> I guess this is what I saw in other packages and just
> adopted. What's the difference? Where is it defined? What is the usual
> content? O:-)

CROSS_AUTOCONF_ROOT -> configure is called with --prefix=/
CROSS_AUTOCONF_USR  -> configure is called with --prefix=/usr

When I create a new package I usually use what other distros are using. In
most cases that's /usr. Unless there is a good reason, this should not be
changed for any existing package.

Michael


-- 
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de