From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de>
Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.28])
	by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bernhard@bwalle.de>) id 1SHJoX-0000PA-Cy
	for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:59:46 +0200
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:59:43 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
Message-ID: <20120409185943.GB7410@regiomontanus.bwalle.de>
References: <4F831846.3060203@bwalle.de>
 <4F832414.2090800@biessmann.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F832414.2090800@biessmann.de>
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Using PTXdist on Mac OS
Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List <ptxdist.pengutronix.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/pipermail/ptxdist>
List-Post: <mailto:ptxdist@pengutronix.de>
List-Help: <mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bie=DFmann?= <andreas@biessmann.de>
Cc: ptxdist@pengutronix.de

Hi,

* Andreas Bie=DFmann <andreas@biessmann.de> [2012-04-09 20:01]:
> =

> a) Fink is _not_ Debian based but uses the great Debian package format
> (*.deb ;)

Well, depends on what you call 'Debian-based'. I didn't say that the
packages are from Debian (the MacPorts packages are also not from
Free/Open/NetBSD).

finkproject.org says "Fink uses Debian tools like dpkg and apt-get to
provide powerful binary package management. " So is the wording

Is following acceptable?

------------------------------------ 8< ------------------------------------
  \item \textbf{Fink} (\url{http://www.finkproject.org}) uses the package
    management tools and the package format from Debian.  Contrary to
    MacPorts, it has both binaries and can be built from source (but as far=
 as
    I know, the binaries are less up-to-date compared the source packages).
------------------------------------ >8 ------------------------------------

> b) FSF GCC is _not_ required for GNU Toolchain bootstrap, I did compile
> my arm-cortexa8, arm-v4t, arm-v5te, x86_64 and avr32 OSELAS.Toolchain wit=
h:

This experience is from the time when I used Xcode 4.2 (I had to wait
for the update until MacPorts got support for it). I got llvm-gcc
segmentation faults and this was also "documented" in the bug tracker of
FSF GCC. And I think that in LLVM bugtracker was a fix already in SVN of
LLVM GCC.

I'm just running a build of a toolchain with Xcode 4.3(.2) LLVM GCC and
if that build succeeds then I will remove the restriction to FSF GCC and
mention Xcode 4.3 somewhere in the requirements.

bwalle@euler % gcc --version
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 565=
8) (LLVM build 2336.9.00)

> (But maybe there are some Fink stuff leaking in and let it build on my
> system? Did not investigate it further ...)

I don't think that some Fink environment settings fixes GCC segmentation fa=
ults.
But we will see.

> c) you forget Fink package names (patches follow ;)

Patch is applied, thanks. But I will wait for J=FCrgens comments until I
upload a new PDF.


Regards,
Bernhard

-- =

ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de