From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: From: Juergen Beisert Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:32:17 +0100 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201201261132.17940.jbe@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [oselas] GTK+ on DirectFB Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: oselas@community.pengutronix.de Cc: ptxdist@pengutronix.de, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia Hi Guillermo, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > [...] > (testgtk:739): Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_drawable_set_colormap: > assertion `cmap == NULL || gdk_drawable_get_depth (drawable) == cmd > (*) Direct/Thread: Started 'EventBufferFeed' (-1) [MESSAGING > OTHER/OTHER 0/0] <8388608>... > (!) [ 739: 0.000] --> Caught signal 11 (at 0x28, invalid address) > <-- > (!!!) *** WARNING [still objects in 'Window Pool'] *** [object.c:241 in fusion_object_pool_destroy()] > (!!!) *** WARNING [still objects in 'Layer Region Pool'] *** > [object.c:241 in fusion_object_pool_destroy()] > (!!!) *** WARNING [still objects in 'Layer Context Pool'] *** > [object.c:241 in fusion_object_pool_destroy()] > (!!!) *** WARNING [still objects in 'Surface Pool'] *** > [object.c:241 in fusion_object_pool_destroy()] > Aborted > > Can anyone share any experiences on this? Did you re-start with a clean GTK after you switch from Xorg to DirectFB? Sometimes the package's buildsystem does not re-compile everything after changing some parameters, so some object files are still compiled for the previous parameter settings. Just an idea. Sorry, haven't worked with DirectFB for ages, no other idea. Regards, Juergen -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de