From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.98]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RpJcv-0004Gn-CQ for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:08:02 +0100 Received: from [78.47.165.117] (helo=regiomontanus.bwalle.de) by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1RpJcr-0008Pf-QH for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:07:57 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:07:55 +0100 From: Bernhard Walle Message-ID: <20120123130755.GA8695@regiomontanus.bwalle.de> References: <1327165141-8606-1-git-send-email-andreas@biessmann.de> <1327243762-24190-1-git-send-email-andreas@biessmann.de> <4F1D554C.6090608@corscience.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1D554C.6090608@corscience.de> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH v2] replace umkimage by u-boot sources Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de * Andreas Bie=DFmann [2012-01-23 13:40]: > = > shouldn't we build two different packages (u-boot-tool-mkimage, > u-boot-tool-env) here? I would add that tools as part of the u-boot package. Mixing a host tool with target tools don't sound like a good idea. Regards, Bernhard -- = ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de