From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mediacenter.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:2::65]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYcHX-0003h9-OR for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:36:55 +0100 Received: from mol by mediacenter.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYcHX-0001wK-NR for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:36:55 +0100 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 12:36:55 +0100 From: Michael Olbrich Message-ID: <20111208113655.GE11859@pengutronix.de> References: <3944866A166FC34A948C72DD5EDDCA2A1DC6F400@HQ0SBS01.airtag.local> <20111207165515.GC11859@pengutronix.de> <3944866A166FC34A948C72DD5EDDCA2A1DC6F445@HQ0SBS01.airtag.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3944866A166FC34A948C72DD5EDDCA2A1DC6F445@HQ0SBS01.airtag.local> Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH 1/2] lua: Correct implementation for version 5.1.4 Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:08:44PM +0000, Beno=EEt BURNICHON wrote: > - 1 patch for xmlrpc-c Not strictly necessary because SF is doing some fancy redirects, but it is correct, so I'll apply it. Why do they need a separate directory for each file??? > - 1 patch for php5 Well, php5.{make,in} could certainly use some cleanup, but your patch doesn't make it worse. I need to do some test first but it looks ok otherwise. Michael -- = Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- = ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de