From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.29.23]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RGlpJ-0004yb-T7 for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:10:03 +0200 Received: from [78.47.165.117] (helo=regiomontanus.bwalle.de) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1RGlpJ-0003iA-HE for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:10:01 +0200 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:10:00 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle Message-ID: <20111020061000.GA6240@regiomontanus.bwalle.de> References: <1318893704-23961-1-git-send-email-jon@ringle.org> <20111019174624.GN7130@pengutronix.de> <4E9F1C64.6040604@bwalle.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] ptxd_ipkg_rev_smaller: fix compare with empty micro Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de * Jon Ringle [2011-10-19 21:55]: > > > What do you think about the bash implementation found here: > http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/dkms-devel/2004-July/000142.html If it is correct and works, why not. Regards, Bernhard -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de