From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de>
Received: from lnx503.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.156.232])
	by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <tstone@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>)
	id 1TmUxh-0006Ln-EO
	for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:42:22 +0100
Received: from mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (lnx504.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de
	[130.83.156.233])
	by lnx503.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/HRZ/PMX) with ESMTP id
	qBMJgK8T031184
	for <ptxdist@pengutronix.de>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:42:20 +0100
	(envelope-from tstone@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de)
Received: from [93.220.239.220] (helo=virgo.localnet)
	by mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <tstone@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>)
	id 1TmUxg-0006wR-4N
	for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:42:20 +0100
From: Tim Sander <tstone@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:42:07 +0100
Message-ID: <1697569.HrfM5Tud5B@virgo>
In-Reply-To: <20121221195444.2a75df2e@skate>
References: <50D44105.9050900@erwinrol.com>
	<20121221184629.GE23720@pengutronix.de>
	<20121221195444.2a75df2e@skate>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Qt 5
Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de
List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List <ptxdist.pengutronix.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/pipermail/ptxdist>
List-Post: <mailto:ptxdist@pengutronix.de>
List-Help: <mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://metis.pengutronix.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ptxdist>, 
	<mailto:ptxdist-request@pengutronix.de?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de
To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de

Hi
> > I'm working on it. Not sure, when you'll see something.
Thats great news. I could give the rasperry a shot, but not right now...
> Since you're talking about Qt 5 and OpenGL, my understanding is that Qt
> 5 absolutely required OpenGL. Is this correct? If so, what's the plan
> for more basic ARM SoCs that don't have 3D acceleration?
I think the best solution would be to keep qt4 and qt5 as seperate packages.
The qt4.8.4 is pretty recent and well i guess most of the work has been done 
or is the maintenance burden so high?

Best regards
Tim

-- 
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de