From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22c]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WSXQC-0008DI-Rq for ptxdist@pengutronix.de; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:54:06 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id e49so856876eek.31 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:53:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexander Aring Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:53:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1395777230-16813-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> Subject: [ptxdist] [PATCH v2 0/4] python: add simpleRPL package, dependencies and cakes Reply-To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de List-Id: PTXdist Development Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de Errors-To: ptxdist-bounces@pengutronix.de To: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Cc: Alexander Aring Hi, this patch series adds the simpleRPL python implementation into ptxdist. This implementation is in a early state of development. I talked with the original Author "Tony Cheneau", he doesn't have time anymore to work on this implementation. Now, I have some time and will look at this code and maybe I do some implementation to that. There are two questions for me: i) The license is a NIST license which describes [1]: "... As a result, a formal license is not needed to use this software." I don't add any LICENSE to the rule files, but which is the correct ptxdist synonym for a NIST license, but the NIST license says the software has no license. I think there is no NIST license and the NIST developers doens't release the software under any license. ii) I uploaded the software to my cakelab account. I hope that's okay, the alternative would be github. But github has a confusing naming style at generate releases for software and I can't change them. I have still access to the cakelab "bakery for gourmets" server and I will take care of this that the RPL cakes (the software archives) is still there for ptxdist. I know the owner of the cake laboratories. There are still some change needed to the buildsystem to work better with ptxdist. I will try to do that and will send patches for these rules then. For example ("[PATCH 3/4] python-rplicmp: add new package") will call $(CROSS_CC) directly. - Alex [1] https://github.com/tcheneau/simpleRPL/blob/master/LICENSE.txt changes since v2: - change lib permission in python-rplicmp to 644 - change lib permission in python-routing to 644 - add python tag to cover-letter Alexander Aring (4): host-cython: add CROSS_CYTHON_ENV declaration python-routing: add new package python-rplicmp: add new package simplerpl: add new package rules/host-cython.make | 2 ++ rules/python-routing.in | 13 ++++++++ rules/python-routing.make | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ rules/python-rplicmp.in | 11 +++++++ rules/python-rplicmp.make | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ rules/simplerpl.in | 13 ++++++++ rules/simplerpl.make | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 267 insertions(+) create mode 100644 rules/python-routing.in create mode 100644 rules/python-routing.make create mode 100644 rules/python-rplicmp.in create mode 100644 rules/python-rplicmp.make create mode 100644 rules/simplerpl.in create mode 100644 rules/simplerpl.make -- 1.9.1 -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de